Skip to content

Enum: Review Process Type

The possible values for the metric that describes the review process undertaken by the organizers of an academic event.

Permissible Values

Value Meaning Description
double-blind peer review None The reviewers do not know who the authors of the manuscript are. And the authors do not know who the reviewers are either.
single-blind peer review None The reviewers know who is the authors of the manuscript are. But the authors do not know who the reviewers are.
open peer review None The reviewers know who is the authors of the manuscript are. Abd the authors know who the reviewers are.
post-publication peer review None There is a plattform on which the manuscript is being reviewed after its publication.
transparent peer review None The authors' identity is known to the reviewers but the reviewers' identity is only made public if the reviewers give their consent to reveal their identity.
collaborative peer review None The authors and reviewers discuss together how the manuscript can be improved, whereas the reviewers identity is concealed and can be unvealed upon publication.
cascading peer review None If the manuscript has been reviewd but the editors reject it and refer to submit it elsewhere alongn with the review.